What bin Laden's saying: It's all-out war on civilians
That's right people, the mouthpiece of islam, ol' Osama himself, has just told all those self-proclaimed, peace lovin' muslims out there, that you are now a target. Every American man, woman and child, young and old, is now fair game in "kill the infidel". If even a fraction of the muslims around the world follow through on Osama's invitation, then we could very well get a taste of what Israel faces every day.
The latest tape from Osama bin Laden, aired by al-Jazeera Sunday, is a call upon all Muslims to take part in a new jihad against the United States, Israel and Europe that will include the killing of more civilians.
The al-Qaida leader said the American people, including women and children, have become fair targets because they continue to support the decisions of the Bush administration.
"The war is a responsibility between the people and the governments," bin Laden said. "The war goes on and the [American] people are renewing their allegiance to its rulers and masters. They send their sons to armies to fight us and they continue their financial and moral support while our countries are burned, our houses are bombed and our people are killed." In an exclusive interview with G2 Bulletin, Hamid Mir, the only journalist to interview bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri in the wake of 9-11, said the issuance of the tape was necessitated by Europe's rejection of al-Qaida's offer of a truce two years ago, and the subsequent rejection of a similar truce that was offered to the United States.
Mir had predicted bin Laden's imminent release of a message on al-Jazeera in a report published by G2 Bulletin and WND just days before.
"There was only one positive response from America," according to Mir. "Douglas A. Borer wrote an article in The Christian Science Monitor on January 24, 2006, [in which] he argued that the British had made peace with the IRA and the U.S. had come to terms with Libya's terror-sponsoring leader [Moammar] Gadhafi. Then why not al-Qaida? The American government said that talking to terrorists is not their policy."
Mir contends this rejection has served to give rise to increased support for bin Laden throughout the Muslim world and widespread belief that the only recourse against alleged Western aggression is total war, including attacks on civilian populations.
Asked about the current opinion of bin Laden in the Muslim world, Mir said: "Osama bin Laden has become more popular only after 9-11. Incidents like the mistreatment of Iraqi prisoners in Abu Ghraib jail, the desecration of the holy Quran in Guantanamo Bay prisons, and then the publication of the blasphemous caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad in Denmark spread a lot of hatred against the West in the Muslim world. This hatred is the real strength of Osama bin Laden."
Mir believes that bin Laden has become the hero of anti-American Muslim youth by default.
"Many Muslims," he says, "are of the view that America played a role in implementing the U.N. resolutions on East Timor. This Christian majority province of Indonesia got independence through the U.N., but the Muslim majority Kashmir area of India is denied the same right because the West is biased against the Muslims. Now, the Muslim youth is getting allergic [to] Islamic clerics who oppose al-Qaida. More than 1,500 tribal elders and Islamic clerics have been assassinated by pro-al-Qaida militants in the South Waziristan area of Pakistan in the past two years. These 1,500 elders and clerics cooperated with the Pakistan army and opposed the presence of foreign fighters in their area."
He believes the issuance of the tape will result in a new wave of violence, particularly in Egypt and the Darfur province of Sudan.
"Bin Laden wants the West to send more troops into Darfur," he claims, "and then the al-Qaida fighters in Sudan, Somalia, Kenya, Tanzania and other African countries will have an opportunity to test their jihadi spirits against the 'enemies of Islam.'"
The Pakistani journalist claims bin Laden needs another Iraq in Africa to serve as a breeding ground for al-Qaida and a bleeding ground for American troops.
Mir further maintains that bin Laden remains in control of all aspects of al-Qaida and that al-Zawahiri, who has been called "the real brains" of the terrorist organization, only serves in a subservient role.
"Dr. Zawahiri was not aware about the 9-11 planning," he says. "He was not present in the meeting of Osama and Mullah Omar, which took place in southern Afghanistan in August 2005. Suicide bombings in Afghanistan were approved by Mullah Omar in that meeting. How can Zawahiri be the brain of Osama? The real brain was Muhammad Atef who was killed in November 2001 in Ghazni by American predators. Osama himself has a very sharp mind. America has failed to nab him. The failure of America proves that Osama is clever."
Concerning the present whereabouts of the elusive emir, Mir maintains that bin Laden found shelter in the frontier regions of Pakistan in the wake of the bombing of his mountain fortress at Tora Bora. Among the Pashtun tribes, bin Laden remained protected by the Islamic code of milmastia, which demands protection for fellow Muslims who seek shelter in their country - even if such shelter means risking their lives.
From 2002 to 2004, bin Laden spent most of his time in the valley of Dir, about 50 miles from the Afghan border on the Kunar Province. Dir remains within the Malakand Pass, the site of some of the fiercest skirmishes under the British Raj. A Pakistani fort still stands where the young Winston Churchill shot down rebels and received a citation for heroism. The fort is presently occupied by Maulvi Sufi Mohamad, an old and revered Muslim scholar, who maintains a Taliban-style rule of the area with public executions of adulterers, homosexuals, apostates and Christian infidels. It was an area in which bin Laden felt quite at home.
Despite the $25 million bounty the U.S. government placed on his head - a bounty that is proclaimed by thousands of Pashtu-language leaflets that are dropped by U.S. aircraft on a regular basis - bin Laden felt secure enough to travel to other parts of Pakistan, including periodic trips to Peshawar and the smuggler-infested bazaar town of Rabate J'ali, north of Zahedan, within the center of "the Devil's Triangle," the conjunction of the borders of Pakistan, Afghanistan and Iran.
In 2004, according to Mir, bin Laden resettled in the Kunar province of eastern Afghanistan, only to return to the tribal regions of Pakistan in 2005.
Mir maintains that bin Laden now regularly moves from both locations with little fear of capture. The Pakistani journalist says that his beliefs in this regard have been confirmed by Gen. Richard Myers and other leading American military officials.
Mir's account of the present whereabouts of the elusive emir confirms an Aug. 6 report WND.
11 Comments:
Actually, some so-called Christian Zionists have been hoping for a Clash of Civilizations because they believe it will hasten the second coming of Christ. No wonder Muslims feel the Crusaders have returned to steal their land. See www.dundeesblod.blogspot.com
Correction: It's www.dundeesblog.blogspot.com
Dude,
Been there, done that. Dundesblog is a typical, non-Christian, Jew paranoia, U.S. hating, liberal site. Nothing over there I need to see.
And look at you today. Using your "Commonly Used Liberal Terms" book (otherwise known as CULT) today? "Christian Zionist" always cracks me up. That's a handy little, hate filled, label to hang on Christians who actually believe what the Bible says about Israel and the Holy Land.
Dude, wake up and smell the coffee. It doesn't matter a hill of beans if you and your liberal ilk believe in God, Jesus, the Bible or the Second Coming, because it's going to happen one day no matter what you believe. Y'all are going to be the ones standing in the streets with your mouths hanging open.
Now I could go over tons of reasons why pali-land shouldn't even be allowed to exist; why the true "occupiers" (another page out of your "CULT" book) of Israel are the palis, and how the "Crusaders" (That’s on page 3 of the "CULT" book, by the way) don't exist today, but I won't waste my time.
About the only "CULT" phrase you didn't spit out at me today is "Neo-Con", but maybe your keyboard ran out of characters or you forgot how to spell it or something.
Anyway, when you learn how to think for yourself and do your research correctly, come back and talk to me. It's much easier to have a logical discussion with someone when they actually have facts, not just buzzwords straight from "CULT".
God Bless and have a great day!
If www.dundeesbog.blogspot.com is non-Christian, how come the latest entry quotes the New Testament in order to show that Christian Zionist Crusader war-mongers are non-Christian. In fact it's clear that at the Second Coming you will be surprised to find that "many that are first shall be last; and the last shall be first." (St. Matthew 19:30) In other words don't be so sure that your inexorable hatred of Muslims will serve you well in the end. If you want to become educated about the Middle East you might start out by reading "The Iron Wall" by Avi Shlaim.
"The Iron Wall"...I've read it. Not impressed. A cute story, by a self-proclaimed, revisionist historian. What a contradiction in terms "revisionist historian" is. History either happened or it didn't. Also, let me beat you to the punch and bring out your "Jews control the world" conspiracy theory. I've always laughed at that one. Why would any group with so much power, want to live in a tiny piece of land, surrounded by enemies sworn to kill them, when according to your own definition, they should be able go anywhere...you know, since they own and control everything. Your logic falls flat on its face in light of the simplest argument.
Now let's look at the Bible. You do remember the Bible don't you? It's that great big book, authored by God, usually covered in dust in most people's houses, but that just happens to say that the Israelites are His (God's) chosen people. And since God is unchanging, guess what Dude? They are still His chosen people. If you continue to read, you'll see this part where God gives His people a certain piece of land. They call it the "Promised Land". Guess what? Within the boundaries of this "Promised Land" lies a couple of modern day territories/countries. They happen to be Israel, the Gaza Strip and the West Bank. Gasp!! You mean that the land that God gave to the Israelis thousand of years before the palestinians were ever invented is the same place they are trying to live now?
Your lack of knowledge in the Bible is amazing.
Before you start throwing around Bible verses, out of context by the way, you might start by actually reading the Bible. The whole Bible. Old Testament and New Testament together.
I have no hatred of the palis, just the methods they use to try to eliminate people who have every right to be living right where they are.
Now here's you homework for tonight. Read the Bible, cover to cover. Find some historical references who's goals are to report history, not re-write it to suite their own agenda and then you can come back and have a logical discussion armed with facts, not the liberal, Jew hating mantra you've given me so far. Or at least give me something original, not something straight from the liberal, Jew Hating mantra playbook.
God Bless!
Oh yeah, I forgot to mention this.
Jesus is a Jew. That's right boys and girls, the very Jesus that Anonymous and my good friend at dundeesblog say they hold in such hight regards, was none other than a part of the very race they hate and want to see "driven into the sea".
Kinda inconsistent, isn't it.
Here's a cool article you might want to read sometime.
Jesus is a Jew
By the way, as far as people being able to throw around Bible passages, out of context, to try to make a point...
Even Satan could do that!
According to U. Texas Professor Wm. Roger Louis, "Avi Schlaim (Oxford Professor) is one of the foremost 'revisionist' historians of Israel, but revisionist in a positive sense. His account of fifty years of Israeli history is scrupulously fair and meticulous in its use of evidence. Dealing with the motives of Arabs and Israelis with equal skepticism, "The Iron Wall" provides us with a frontal assault on the legends surrounding the Israeli state." This, it is revisionist in that it refutes the longstanding legends with accurate information. The reason accurate info is important is that Muslims around the world hate us because we have allowed the Palestinians to be treated unfairly. My point about Christian Zionists is that some of them actually want a world war with the Muslims believing it would hasten the Secomd Coming. This craving for war is un-Christian. Jesus was Jewish, but He left the Old Testament eye-for-an-eye values in order to present the world with better ones. As I suggested, see www.dundeesblog.blogspot.com
Daniel Wultz, a Florida teenager lying in a coma after being critically injured last week in a suicide bombing at an Israeli restaurant, is the "best target combination we can dream of - American and Zionist," Abu Nasser, a leader of the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, one of the groups responsible for the deadly blast, told WorldNetDaily.
And these are the people you are defending? Unbelievable!
You still don't understand. (sigh).
Not only have you not studied the Bible, you also have a severe lack of understanding of what drives muslims to do the things they do.
If I thought you'd get the least bit of good out of it, I could step you through passages in both the Bible and Koran (I’ve read both, cover to cover) to support my position.
But since your "Bible" seems to be a book written by Avi Schlaim, there really isn't any point trying to help you here. You mind is too closed to understand what I would tell you.
I'll leave you with this thought...
For Bible believing Christians, God has re-established His people Israel in their Promised Land. The Bible tells us that the entire world will hate God's people and try to destroy them.
You say that "Christian Zionist" are the problem by trying to force a war, but you have yet to mention the Iranian mad man who has repeatedly called for the annihilation of Israel and is in the process of building nukes in order to accomplish this task.
The Bible tells us about this too, and Bible believing Christians are okay with this. You see, we've read the book that matters. We believe what it says. What is says, is that in the end, no matter what man wants or desires, God wins. QED.
You see, I'm one of the "Fundies" that dundeesblog and his ilk like to slam. I believe the Bible is perfect as written and is completely accurate.
So you see, my friend, no matter what you, dundeesblog, the pali terrorist, the arabs and muslims, or even the Jews want, the bottom line is that God is going to take care of it all.
I have a feeling that you're not going to like what He decides.
God Bless and Good Luck.
Israelis have killed many times more innocent Palestinian civilians than the Palestinians have killed Israelis but that seems to be fine with your bizarre interpretation of your religion. You cherry-pick the Bible to find those passages which go along with your pro-war philosophy forgetting that Jesus was a peacemaker. In this regard you are like the Muslim fanatics who use the Koran as an excuse for suicide bombing. Jesus never would have advocated kicking Palestinans, some of whom are Christians, out of their homes where they've lived for 1300 years so that Jews from the Bronz could move in and steal their landand livelihoods. This is why the Iranians, and all the other 1.3 billion Muslims in the world hate us. But of course, this is what you want, in your insane belief that it will usher in the Second Coming of Christ. Actually, Christ is here all the time and you do not realize it.
Exactly what verses and passages am I "cherry-picking". Because you choose to ignore the Old Testament and not take the Bible as a whole, in other words "cherry-picking" from the New Testament, could it not be said that you are guilty of the very thing you accuse me of?
The reason the muslims don't like us, according to the Koran, is because they are ordered to "kill infidels". That's you, me and just about everyone else in the world.
You might be interested to know that British surveyors who wrote, about the Holy Land, at the turn of the century (1900) described the land as virtually empty, with no roads, only seeing an occasional nomad (look up what "nomad" means sometime). The land was barren and desolate.
Oh course, why would you want to believe British surveyors, writing before the Jews were repatriated, when you have a revisionist historian to believe.
You're beliefs really are all over the road, my friend. You seem to indicate that you are Christian, but refuse to believe the Bible. I say this because the second comming is spelled out so clearly in Revelations (which happens to be in the New Testament, the part of the Bible you claim to believe over the Old Testament).
One last word, and then this thread is closed.
God will choose the time of the second comming when He wants it to be. Nothing man does will make God do it one second before He is ready.
Post a Comment
<< Home